Generative Artificial Intelligence and Academic Performance
Mediating Role of Smart Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70641/ajbds.v1i2.98Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, smart learning environment, academic performance, university studentsAbstract
The purpose of the study was to investigates the relationship between generative artificial intelligence (GAI), academic performance (AP) and smart learning environment (SLE) as a mediator. A convenience sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 456 respondents. Primary data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Partial least squares-structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyse the structural model and determine the direct connections between the different elements. The results establish that generative artificial intelligence has a positive and significant influence on smart learning environment and academic performance (β = 0.523, t = 10.178, p < 0.000); β = 0.387, t = 7.353, p < 0.000 respectively). Simultaneously, smart learning environment partially mediates between the generative artificial intelligence and academic performance among university students (β = 0.06, t = 1.19, p < 0.234). The results of this study contributes to the current academic discourse on technology-enhanced education by showing that generative artificial intelligence have a positive impact on students’ academic performance.
References
Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527
Allal-Ch´erif, O., Yela Aranega, A.,´ Castano, R., & Sanchez, R. (2021). Intelligent recruitment: how to identify, select, and retain talents from around the world using artificial intelligence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120822
Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M.S., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Al-Rahmi, W.M., & Aljeraiwi, A.A. (2020). Task-technology fit and technology acceptance model application to structure and evaluate the adoption of social media in Academia. IEEE Access, 8, 78427-78440, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990420
Al-Mamary, Y. H., Alfalah, A. A., Alshammari, M. M., & Abubakar, A.A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing university students’ intentions to use ChatGPT: analysing tasktechnology fit theory to enhance behavioural intentions in higher education. Future Business Journal 10 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024- 00406-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00406-5
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
Barclay, D., Thompson, R., & Higgins, C. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use an illustration. Technology Studies, 2 (2), 285-309.
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86, 369–385. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10734-022- 0937-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Boer, G.W.J.M., Stevens, C., Finkenauer, M.E., de Looze, M.E., & van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M. (2021). M.Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: investigating directionality and mediating processes, Comput. Human Behav. 116 106645, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645
Bolick, A.D., & da Silva, R.L. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence tools and their potential impact to instructional design workflows and organizational systems., TechTrends, Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning. A Publication of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 68 (1),91-100, doi: 10.1007/s11528-023-00894-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00894-2
Chan, C.K.Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20 (1), 43-18, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: a review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F.L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
Choi, W., Yeo, I.S., & Ko, D.S. (2016). Research on strategic implementation of blended smart-learning in tennis using analytic network process. Information, 19 (2), 405-411.
Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A., & Hatta, H. (2023). Analysing the Role of ChatGPT in Improving Student Productivity in Higher Education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14886-14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3 (15), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B., & Chong, A.Y.L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117 (3), 442-458, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2-24, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-20180203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J.F.J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26 (2), 106-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications Limited
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P.A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116 (1),. 2-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Howard, M.C., & Henderson, J. (2023). A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: identifying current practices and avenues for improvement. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113328, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328
Hu, Z., & Qin, J. (2018). Generalizability of causal inference in observational studies under retrospective convenience sampling, Stat. Med. 37 (19) 2874–2883, https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7808
Hwang, J.H., & Choi, H.J. (2016). Influence of smart devices on the cognition and interest of underprivileged students in smart education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (44), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i44/105171
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
Kamalov, F., Santandreu C.D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15 (16), 12451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
Kumar, S., Rao, P., Singhania, S., Verma, S., & Kheterpal, M. (2024). Will artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123258
Leguina, A. (2015), “A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)”, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
Li, K.C., & Wong, B.T.M. (2021). Review of smart learning: patterns and trends in research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37 (2), 189-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6617
Mujere, N. (2016). Sampling in research, in Mixed Methods Research for Improved Scientific Study. IGI Global, 107-121, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0007-0.ch006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0007-0.ch006
Norušis, M.J. (2008). SPSS Statistics 17.0 Guide to Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
Ocaña, Y., Valenzuela, L., & Garro, L. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and its Implications in Higher Education. Propósitoy Representaciones, 7(2), 536–568. http://doi.org/10.20511/ pyr2019.v7n2.274
Ou, S. (2024). Transformating education: The evolving role of artificial intelligence in the students academic performance. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 13 (2), 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/cc1x7r95
Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University students’ perception of video-based learning in times of COVID-19: a TAM/TTF perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37 (10), 903-921, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 7th ed., Routledge, London, doi: 10.4324/9781003117452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Ramo, R.M., Alshaher, A.A., & Al-Fakhry, N.A. (2022). The effect of using artificial intelligence on learning performance in Iraq: the dual factor theory perspective. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d Information, 27 (2), 255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270209
Roscoe, A.M., Lang, D., & Sheth, J.N. (1975). Follow-up methods, questionnaire length, and market differences in mail surveys, J. Mark. 39 (2) 20, https://doi.org/10.2307/1250111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1250111
Samaha, M., & Hawi, N.S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life, Comput. Human Behav. 57 (2016) 321–325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045
Sanchez-Reina, J.R., Theophilou, E., Ognibene, D., & Davinia, H.L. (2023). Shall We Rely on Bots?’ Students’ Adherence to the Integration of ChatGPT in the Classroom.
Shahzad, M.F., Xu, S., Lim, W.M; Yang, X., & Khan, Q.R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 28 (4), 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523
Shailendra, S., Kadel, R., & Sharma, A. (2024). Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education. IEEE Transactions on Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.172175540.04742569/v1
Singh, E., Visishta, P., & Singla, A. (2024). AI-enhanced education: exploring the impact of AI literacy on generation Z’s academic performance in North India. Quality Assurance in Education: DOI 10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0037
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Allyn and Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston, MA, xxvii.
Thurzo, A., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Surovkov´a, J., & Afrashtehfar, K. I. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: A review and guide for curriculum update. Education Sciences, 13(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020150
Wood, D., & Moss, S.H. (2024). Evaluating impact of students’ generative AI use in educational contexts. Journal of research in innovative teaching & learning, 17 (2), 152-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2024-0151
Yang, Y., Zhuang, Y., & Pan, Y. (2021). Multiple knowledge representation for big data artificial intelligence: framework, applications, and case studies. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 22(12), 1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2100463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2100463
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C.S., Jong, M.S.Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J., Yuan, J., & Li, Y., (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021 (1), 1-18.
Zhang, T., Shaikh, Z.A., Yumashev, A.V., & Chła. D, M. (2020). Applied model of E-learning in the framework of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(16), 6420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166420
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joseph Ngugi Kamau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 